Monday, September 28, 2009

I hope the Blue Dogs read the CongressDaily section of the National Journal over the weekend.

If they did, they would find that the preferred Public Option plan has been shown by The Congressional Budget Office (which, as we know, is impartial) to save $85 Billion more than the plan they favor (and Blue Dogs are ONLY Blue Dogs because they want to save money!). Here’s a cut from the article:

In a bid to wrangle concessions from the Blue Dog Coalition on healthcare reform, House leaders Thursday released CBO estimates for liberals’ preferred version of the public option that show $85 billion more in savings than for the version the Blue Dogs prefer.

Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, D-S.D., a Blue Dog co-chair, said any possible new momentum toward a public option tethered to Medicare rates is, in part, “because of the cost issue” and the updated CBO score.

The original House bill required the public plan to pay providers 5 percent more than Medicare reimbursement rates. But as part of a package of concessions to Blue Dogs, the House Energy and Commerce Committee accepted an amendment that requires the HHS Secretary to negotiate rates with providers. That version of the plan will save only $25 billion.

In total, a public plan based on Medicare rates would save $110 billion over 10 years. That is $20 billion more than earlier estimates, a spokesman for House Speaker Pelosi said.

So if your Representative is a Blue Dog, give ‘em a call. Today. Now. They’ll be working again tomorrow (after Atoning for their kissing of lobbyists asses for Yom Kippur) and they need to hear from you.

No comments:

Post a Comment